asokatechnologies@gmail.com 09347143789/09949240245

Search This Blog

Friday, 18 August 2017

Inertial Response of an Offshore Wind Power Plant with HVDC-VSC


 ABSTRACT:

KEYWORDS:
2.       Inertial response
3.       Offshore wind turbine

SOFTWARE: MATLAB/SIMULINK

 BLOCK DIAGRAM:


Fig. 1. Test system schematic
EXPECTED SIMULATION RESULTS:


Fig. 2. ΔT order applied to the controller of the DFIG


Fig. 3. DFIG rotating speed, 150 MW


Fig. 4. DFIG electromagnetic torque, 150 MW


Fig. 5. HVDC link voltage , 150 MW


Fig. 6. HVDC link current, 150 MW


Fig. 7. Real and reactive power (rectifier side), 150 MW


Fig. 8. Real and reactive power (inverter side), 150 MW


Fig. 9. DFIG rotating speed, 180 MW


Fig. 10. DFIG electromagnetic torque, 180 MW


Fig. 11. HVDC link voltage , 180 MW


Fig. 12. HVDC link current, 180 MW


Fig. 13. Real and reactive power (rectifier side), 180 MW


Fig. 14. Real and reactive power (inverter side), 180 MW


Fig. 15. DFIG rotating speed, 200 MW, 12 m/s


Fig. 16. DFIG electromagnetic torque, 200 MW, 12 m/s



Fig. 17. HVDC link voltage , 200 MW, 12 m/s


Fig. 18. HVDC link current, 200 MW, 12 m/s

CONCLUSION:
Detailed time domain simulations were conducted in order to analyze the transients present on the inertial response of an offshore WPP delivering power through an HVDC-VSC link. Several results from transient behavior are presented, these results show that an offshore WPP connected to the grid via an HVDC-VSC link is able to deliver inertial response if it is requested.
These results are important as the WPP importance for the power system is growing and its performance during contingencies must be asured.
REFERENCES:
[1] A. Bodin, “HVDC Light—A Preferable Power Transmission System for Renewable Energies.” Proceedings of the 2011 Third International Youth Conference on Energetics; July 7–9, 2011, Leiria, Portugal
[2] M. de Prada Gil, O. Gomis-Bellmunt, A. Sumper, and J. Bergas-Jané, “Analysis of a Multi-Turbine Offshore Wind Farm Connected to a Single Large Power Converter Operated with Variable Frequency.” Energy (36: 5), May 2011; pp. 3272–3281
[3] Feltes, C., and Erlich, I. “Variable Frequency Operation of DFIG-Based Wind Farms Connected to the Grid Through VSC-HVDC Link.” IEEE Power Engineering Society General Meeting, June 24–28, 2007, Tampa, Florida.
[4] N. Miller, K. Clark, M. Cardinal, and R. Delmerico, "Grid-friendly wind plants controls: GE Wind CONTROL—Functionality and field tests," presented at European Wind Energy Conf., Brussels, Belgium, 2008.

[5] N. W. Miller, K. Clark, and M. Shao, “Impact of frequency responsive wind plant controls on grid performance,” presented at 9th International Workshop on Large-Scale Integration of Wind Power, Quebec, Canada, Oct. 18–19, 2010.

Monday, 14 August 2017

Harmonics Reduction And Power Quality Improvement By Using DPFC



ABSTRACT:
The DPFC is derived from the unified power-flow controller (UPFC). The DPFC can be considered as a UPFC with an eliminated common dc link. The active power exchange between the shunt and series converters which is through the common dc link in the UPFC is now through the transmission lines at the third-harmonic frequency. The DPFC employs the distributed concept, in which the common dc-link between the shunt and series converters are eliminated and three-phase series converter is divided to several single-phase series distributed converters through the line. According to the growth of electricity demand and the increased number of non-linear loads in power grids harmonics, voltage sag and swell are the major power quality problems. DPFC is used to mitigate the voltage deviation and improve power quality. Simulations are carried out in MATLAB/Simulink environment. The presented simulation results validate the DPFC ability to improve the power quality.
KEYWORDS:
1.      Load flow control
2.      FACTS
3.      Power Quality
4.       Harmonics
5.      Sag and Swell Mitigation
6.       Distributed Power Flow Controller
7.       Y–Δ transformer

SOFTWARE: MATLAB/SIMULINK

BLOCK DIAGRAM:


Fig. 1. DPFC configuration

EXPECTED SIMULATION RESULTS:



Fig 2. three phase voltage sag waveform without DPFC


Fig. 3 three phase voltage sag waveform with DPFC



Fig.4 3-ϕ load current swell waveform without DPFC


Fig.5 Mitigation of 3-ϕ load current swell with DPFC
              


Fig.6 Total harmonic distortion of load voltage without DPFC

.


Fig.7 Total harmonic distortion of load voltage with DPFC

CONCLUSION:
This paper has presented a new concept called DPFC. The DPFC emerges from the UPFC and inherits the control capability of the UPFC, which is the simultaneous adjustment of the line impedance, the transmission angle, and the bus voltage magnitude. The common dc link between the shunt and series converters, which is used for exchanging active power in the UPFC, is eliminated. This power is now transmitted through the transmission line at the third-harmonic frequency. The series converter of the DPFC employs the DFACTS concept, which uses multiple small single-phase converters instead of one large-size converter. The reliability of the DPFC is greatly increased because of the redundancy of the series converters. The total cost of the DPFC is also much lower than the UPFC, because no high-voltage isolation is required at the series-converter part and the rating of the components of is low. To improve power quality in the power transmission system, the harmonics due to nonlinear loads, voltage sag and swell are mitigated. To simulate the dynamic performance, a three-phase fault is considered near the load. It is shown that the DPFC gives an acceptable performance in power quality improvement and power flow control.

REFERENCES:
[1] S.Masoud Barakati Arash Khoshkbar sadigh and Mokhtarpour.Voltage Sag and Swell Compensation with DVR Based on Asymmetrical Cascade Multicell Converter North American Power Symposium (NAPS),pp.1-7,2011.
[2] Zhihui Yuan, Sjoerd W.H de Haan, Braham Frreira and Dalibor Cevoric “A FACTS Device: Distributed Power Flow Controller (DPFC)” IEEE Transaction on Power Electronics, vol.25, no.10, October 2010.
[3] Zhihui Yuan, Sjoerd W.H de Haan and Braham Frreira “DPFC control during shunt converter failure” IEEE Transaction on Power Electronics 2009.
[4] M. D. Deepak, E. B. William, S. S. Robert, K. Bill, W. G. Randal, T. B. Dale, R. I. Michael, and S. G. Ian, “A distributed static series compensator system for realizing active power flow control on existing power lines,” IEEE Trans. Power Del., vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 642–649, Jan. 2007.

[5] D. Divan and H. Johal, “Distributed facts—A new concept for realizing grid power flow control,” in Proc. IEEE 36th Power Electron. Spec. Conf. (PESC), 2005, pp. 8–14.

Designing of Multilevel DPFC to Improve Power Quality



ABSTRACT:
According to growth of electricity demand and the increased number of non-linear loads in power grids, providing a high quality electrical power should be considered. In this paper, Enhancement of power quality by using fuzzy based multilevel power flow controller (DPFC) is proposed. The DPFC is a new FACTS device, which its structure is similar to unified power flow controller (UPFC). In spite of UPFC, in DPFC the common dc-link between the shunt and series converters is eliminated and three-phase series converter is divided to several single-phase series distributed converters through the line. This eventually enables the DPFC to fully control all power system parameters. It, also, increases the reliability of the device and reduces its cost simultaneously. In recent years multi level inverters are used high power and high voltage applications .Multilevel inverter output voltage produce a staircase output waveform, this waveform look like a sinusoidal waveform leads to reduction in Harmonics. Fuzzy Logic is used for optimal designing of controller parameters. Application of Fuzzy Multilevel DPFC for reduction of Total Harmonic Distortion was presented. The simulation results show the improvement of power quality using DPFC with Fuzzy logic controller.

KEYWORDS:
1.      FACTS
2.       Power Quality
3.      Multi Level Inverters
4.      Fuzzy Logic
5.       Distributed Power Flow Controller component

SOFTWARE: MATLAB/SIMULINK

BLOCK DIAGRAM:


Fig.1: The DPFC Structure.
EXPECTED SIMULATION RESULTS:



Fig.2: 5 Level Voltage Waveform



Fig.3: Three Phase output Voltage and Current Waveform


Fig.4: Supply Voltage and Current Waveform with unity PF



Fig.5: THD without fuzzy



Fig.6: THD with fuzzy


CONCLUSION:
In this paper Fuzzy Logic Controller technique based distributed power flow controller (DPFC) with multilevel voltage source converter (VSC) is proposed. The presented DPFC control system can regulate active and reactive power flow of the transmission line. We are reducing the THD value from 24.84% to 0.41% by using this technic as shown in fig’s (12) & (13).The series converter of the DPFC employs the DFACTS concept, which uses multiple converters instead of one large-size converter. The reliability of the DPFC is greatly increased because of the redundancy of the series converters. The total cost of the DPFC is also much lower than the UPFC, because no high-voltage isolation is required at the series converter part and the rating of the components are low. Also results show the valid improvement in Power Quality using Fuzzy Logic based Multilevel DPFC.

REFERENCES:
[1] K Chandrasekaran, P A Vengkatachalam, Mohd Noh Karsiti and K S Rama Rao, “Mitigation of Power Quality Disturbances”, Journal of Theoretical and Applied Information Technology, Vol.8, No.2, pp.105- 116, 2009
[2] Priyanka Chhabra, “Study of Different Methods for Enhancing Power Quality Problems”, International Journal of Current Engineering and Technology, Vol.3, No.2, pp.403-410, 2013
[3] Bindeshwar Singh, Indresh Yadav and Dilip Kumar, “Mitigation of Power Quality Problems Using FACTS Controllers in an Integrated Power System Environment: A Comprehensive Survey”, International Journal of Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence, Vol.1, No.1, pp.1-12, 2011
[4] Ganesh Prasad Reddy and K Ramesh Reddy, “Power Quality Improvement Using Neural Network Controller Based Cascaded HBridge Multilevel Inverter Type D-STATCOM”, International Conference on Computer Communication and Informatics, 2012

[5] Lin Xu and Yang Han, “Effective Controller Design for the Cascaded Hbridge Multilevel DSTATCOM for Reactive Compensation in Distribution Utilities”, Elektrotehniski Vestnik, Vol.78, No.4, pp.229- 235, 2011

Sunday, 13 August 2017

Simulation of Distributed Power Flow Controller for Voltage Sag Compensation


ABSTRACT:
 In this paper, we introduced a new series-shunt type FACTS controller called as distributed power flow controller to improve and maintain the power quality of an electrical power system. This DPFC method is same as the UPFC used to compensate the voltage sag and the current swell these are voltage based power quality problems. As compared to UPFC the common dc link capacitor is removed and three individual single phase converters are used instead of a three phase series converter. Series referral voltages, branch currents are used in this paper for designing control circuit. The evaluated values are obtained by using MATLAB/SIMULINK.

KEYWORDS:
1.      DPFC
2.      Power Quality
3.      Voltage Sag
4.      Voltage Swell

SOFTWARE: MATLAB/SIMULINK

 BLOCK DIAGRAM:


Figure 1. Schematic diagram for DPFC.
EXPECTED SIMULATION RESULTS:



Figure 2. Output voltage during fault condition.


Figure 3. Output current during fault condition.

Figure 4. Output voltage compensated by DPFC controller.

Figure 5. Compensated output current by DPFC controller.

Figure 6. Active and reactive power.

Figure 7. THD value of system output voltage without DPFC.

Figure 8. THD value of DPFC (pi controller) load voltage.

Figure 9. THD value of fuzzy controller output voltage.

CONCLUSION:
In this paper we implemented a concept to controlling the power quality issues i.e DPFC. The proposed theory of this device is mathematical formulation and analysis of voltage dips and their mitigations for a three phase source with linear load. In this paper we also proposed a concept of fuzzy logic controller for better controlling action. As compared to all other facts devices the DPFC based Fuzzy has effectively control all power quality problems and with this technique we get the THD as 3.65% and finally the simulation results are shown above.

 REFERENCES:
1. Jamshidi A, Barakati MS, Ghahderijani MM. Presented a paper on Impact of distributed power flow controller to improve power quality based on synchronous reference frame method. IACSIT International Journal of Engineering and Technology. 2012 Oct; 4(5):581–5.
2. Jamshidi A, Barakati MS, Ghahderijani MM. Power quality improvement and mitigation case study using distributed power flow controller; 2012 IEEE International Symposium on Industrial Electronics (ISIE); 2012 May 28-31; Hangzhou; IEEE. p. 464-8.
3. Patne NR, Thakre KL. Presents a topic on Factor affecting characteristics of voltages. Serbian Journal of Electrical Engg during fault in P.S Engineering. 2008 May; 5(1):171–82.
4. Enslin JR. Power mitigation problems. Proceedings of IEEE International Symposium Industrial Electronics (ISIE '98); 1998 Jun. 1:8–20.

5. Chandra A. A review of active filters for power quality improvement. IEEE Trans Ind Electron. 1999 Oct; 46(5):960–71.