ABSTRACT:
1. Asymmetrical
cascaded inverter
2. Super
imposed carrier PWM technique
3. Total
harmonic distortion
4. Adaptive
neuro-fuzzy inference system (ANFIS)
5. Fuzzy
logic controller (FLC)
SOFTWARE: MATLAB/SIMULINK
Figure 1. The fundamental circuit diagram of symmetrical and asymmetrical cascaded inverter.
Figure 2. Load wide output voltage for 31-level modified asymmetrical inverter.
Figure 5. Reference and output RMS voltage for 31-level inverter with fuzzy.
Figure 6. Output voltage across load with Fuzzy logic controller. Figure 7. FFT analysis for 31-level inverter with fuzzy. Figure 8. Output voltage across load with ANFIS controller.CONCLUSION:
The
proposed modified 31-level Asymmetrical cascaded inverter with and without
Fuzzy logic and ANFIS controller is presented in this paper, demonstrating a
substantial change in THD percentages and RMS voltage control. The proposed
modified 31-level Asymmetrical cascaded inverter with Fuzzy logic and ANFIS
controller is designed in MATLAB/ SIMULINK and verified in Real-Time simulation
using OPAL-RT 5700. By using Super Imposed Carrier Pulse Width Modulation (SIC-PWM)
with and without the controller, the RMS output voltage is controlled and THD is
decreased. The performance of step response parameter values is evaluated and
compared for Fuzzy and ANFIS controlled 31-level Asymmetrical cascaded
inverter. The dynamic conditions were also analyzed for different DC source
voltages and variable resistive loads, the RMS output voltage is controlled and
maintained constant (i.e., RMS value is 21.98V for Fuzzy and 22.21V for ANFIS).
Using the analytical solution for a 31-level cascaded inverter, it has been
identified that the THD value for without a controller is 4.97%, with the fuzzy
logic controller is 4.15% and with ANFIS controller is 3.77%. As compared to
the Fuzzy logic controller, the ANFIS controller gives better performance. i.e.,
the RMS Voltage is controlled and settled in less settling time.
REFERENCES:
[1] K. K. Gupta, A. Ranjan, P. Bhatnagar, L. K. Sahu, and S. Jain,
``Multilevel inverter topologies with reduced device count: A review,'' IEEE
Trans. Power Electron., vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 135_151, Jan. 2016.
[2] W. A. Halim, S. Ganeson, M. Azri, and T. T. Azam, ``Review of
multi- level inverter topologies and its applications,'' J. Telecommun.,
Electron. Comput. Eng., vol. 8, no. 7, pp. 51_56, 2016.
[3] R. A. Krishna and L. P. Suresh, ``A brief review on multilevel
inverter topologies,'' in Proc. Int. Conf. Circuit, Power Comput. Technol. (ICCPCT),
Mar. 2016, pp. 1_6.
[4] J. Venkataramanaiah, Y. Suresh, and A. K. Panda, ``A review on
symmetric, asymmetric, hybrid and single DC sources based multilevel inverter topologies,''
Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., vol. 76, pp. 788_812, Sep. 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2017.03.066.
[5] F. Dijkhuizen, ``Multilevel converters: Review, form, function
and motivation,'' in Proc. Ever, 2012, p. 7.