asokatechnologies@gmail.com 09347143789/09949240245

Search This Blog

Friday 18 August 2017

Offshore Wind Farms - VSC-based HVDC Connection


ABSTRACT:
As very promising technology, especially from the technical viewpoint, the focus of this paper will be put on the VSC-based HVDC technology. Its main technical features as well as its model will be detailed. At the end, obtained simulation results for different faults and disturbances for one offshore wind farm connected with VSC-based HVDC technology will be presented.
KEYWORDS:
2.      IGBT
3.      Offshore wind farm connection
4.       PWM
5.      Requirements
6.       Stability
7.       VSC
SOFTWARE: MATLAB/SIMULINK

BLOCK DIAGRAM:



Fig. 1. Principal scheme of VCS-based HVDC connection
EXPECTED SIMULATION RESULTS:




Fig. 2. Active and reactive power at the connection point during reactive power control




Fig. 3. Active and reactive power at the wind farm side during reactive power control


Fig. 4. Active power, reactive power and voltage at system and wind farm side in case of single phase short circuit near to the connection point - 100ms




Fig. 5. Active power, reactive power and voltage at system and wind farm side in case of single phase short circuit at the wind farm side - 100ms

CONCLUSION:
The connection of an offshore wind farm depends primarily on the amount of power that has to be transmitted and the distance to the connection point.
Primarily due to comparatively small size and short distance to the connection point as well as due to its lower costs and experience, all actual offshore wind farms and those planned to be installed are still using/plan to use HVAC connection.
The advantages of using a HVDC solution are more significant with increase of the distance and power.
The VSC-based HVDC technology is due to its technical advantages like: active and, especially, reactive power control (voltage control), isolated operation, no need for an active commutation voltage etc. very good solution for an offshore wind farm connection. Performed simulation and their results of simulated faults and disturbances show that the technical requirements can be fulfilled.
REFERENCES:
[1] European Wind Energy Association. (2004). Wind Energy – The Facts. [Online]. Available: http://www.ewea.org
[2] Global Wind Energy Council. (2004). [Online]. Available: http://www.gwec.net
[3] F.W. Koch, I. Erlich, F. Shewarega, and U. Bachmann, "Dynamic interaction of large offshore wind farms with the electric power system", in Proc. 2003 IEEE Power Tech Conf., Bologna, Italy, vol. 3, pp. 632-638.
[4] J.G. Slootweg and W.L. Kling, "Is the Answer Blowing in the Wind?", IEEE Power and Energy Magazine, vol. 1, pp. 26-33, Nov./Dec. 2003.

[5] Wind Energy Study 2004. [Online]. Available: http://www.ewea.org

Offshore Wind Farm Power Control Using HVdc Link Control de puissance d’un parc éolien en mer utilisant la liaison CCHT


ABSTRACT:
KEYWORDS:
4.       PQ-bus

SOFTWARE: MATLAB/SIMULINK

BLOCK DIAGRAM:



Fig. 1. Proposed configuration of wind turbines connection.


EXPECTED SIMULATION RESULTS:




Fig. 2. (a) Wind speed variations (m/s). (b) Turbine rotational speed (rad/s).
(c) Turbine efficiency.




Fig. 3. HVdc link voltage.



Fig. 4. Wind farm output power.
CONCLUSION:
In this paper, the configuration and control methods have been proposed for the offshore wind turbines, connected to the onshore grid. This method is capable to control and smooth the wind farm output power, injected to the onshore grid. The proposed system can mitigate the fluctuations of wind farm output power, even during wind speed variations. In other words, the wind farm can operate such as a PQ-bus. Moreover, two strategies (fixed power and MPPT) have been analyzed and compared with each other. Finally, the proposed method is compared with other similar works to smooth the output power of the wind farm. The main result is that the proposed method can smooth the output power better than the TSR, PAC, and OTC methods. But it is a bit weaker than the KEC method in power smoothing issue. Moreover, using this method, the wind farm is able to cooperate in frequency control of the onshore grid by controlling the desired active power, to improve the power system operation, which is the future work of the authors.
REFERENCES:
[1] J. O. Dabiri, “Potential order-of-magnitude enhancement of wind farm power density via counter-rotating vertical-axis wind turbine arrays,” J. Renew. Sustain. Energy, vol. 3, no. 4, p. 043104, 2011.
[2] J. Hua, “A floating platform of concrete for offshore wind turbine,” J. Renew. Sustain. Energy, vol. 3, no. 6, p. 063103, 2011.
[3] A. Urtasun, P. Sanchis, I. S. Martín, J. López, and L. Marroyo, “Modeling of small wind turbines based on PMSG with diode bridge for sensorless maximum power tracking,” Renew. Energy, vol. 55, pp. 138–149, Jul. 2012.
[4] (2007). Global Wind and Energy Council, Market Forecast 2010- 2014. [Online]. Available: http://www.gwec.net/fileadmin/documents/ Publications/GlobalWind2007report/market/forecast%2020102014

[5] M. Kesraoui, N. Korichi, and A. Belkadi, “Maximum power point tracker of wind energy conversion system,” Renew. Energy, vol. 4, no. 10, pp. 2655–2662, 2011.

Modeling and Control of Multi-Terminal HVDC with Offshore Wind Farm Integration and DC Chopper Based Protection Strategies


ABSTRACT:
KEYWORDS:
2.      DFIG
3.      DC chopper
4.      Faults
 SOFTWARE: MATLAB/SIMULINK

BLOCK DIAGRAM:
                                                         Fig. 1 Topology of the proposed multi-terminal VSC-HVDC system.

EXPECTED SIMULATION RESULTS:



Fig. 2 Simulation results of MT-HVDC during normal operation: (a) active power of wind farm, (b) dc voltage, and (c) ac rms current.


Fig. 3 Simulation results of 6 DFIG units during normal operation: (a) active power, (b) reactive power, (c) ac rms voltage, and (d) back-to-back dc-link voltage of DFIG unit.


Fig. 4 Simulation results of MT-HVDC during dc pole-to-pole fault with and without full bridge dc chopper protection: (a) dc voltage, and (b) dc current.

Fig. 5 Simulation results of MT-HVDC during three-phase ac ground fault at inverter side with and without half bridge dc chopper protection: (a) ac rms voltage at inverter side, (b) dc voltage overshoot without protection measures, and (c) dc voltage with protection measures.
CONCLUSION:
This paper investigates a multi-terminal VSC-HVDC system, which integrates two DFIG wind farms to the ac grid. The control strategies of both WFVSC and GSVSC stations are discussed in detail, and two approaches employing both full bridge and half bridge dc choppers are extended and displayed. Simulation studies are carried out in normal, dc pole-to-pole and ac ground fault operations, and the result verifies the effectiveness of the proposed MT-HVDC system in both the performance of wind power delivery and the protection measures for various fault conditions. Specifically, the dc voltage drop and dc current overshoot are eliminated during dc fault with full bridge dc choppers, while only a 8% voltage overshoot is observed with the implementation of half bridge dc choppers in case of three-phase ac ground fault.
REFERENCES:
 [1] S. G. Hernandez, E. M. Goytia and O. A. Lara, “Analysis of wide area integration of dispersed wind farms using multiple VSC-HVDC links,” in Proc. of EPE, Sevilla, pp. 17-26, 2008.
[2] S. Towito, M. Berman, G. Yehuda and R. Rabinvici, “Distribution generation case study: electric wind farm doubly fed induction generators”, in Proc. Convention of Electrical and Electronics Engineering(CEEE), Israel, pp. 393-397, Nov. 2006.
[3] N. Flourentzou, V. G. Agelidis, and G. D. Demetriades, “VSC-based HVDC power transmission systems: an overview,” IEEE Trans. Power Electron., vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 592-602, Mar. 2009.
[4] L. Xu, L. Yao, and C. Sasse, “Grid integration of large DFIG-based wind farms ssing VSC transmission,” IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 22, no. 3, pp.976-984, Aug. 2007.

[5] L. Weimers, “HVDC Light: A new technology for a better environment”, IEEE Power Eng. Review, vol. 18, no. 8, pp.19-20, Aug. 1998.

Inertial Response of an Offshore Wind Power Plant with HVDC-VSC


 ABSTRACT:

KEYWORDS:
2.       Inertial response
3.       Offshore wind turbine

SOFTWARE: MATLAB/SIMULINK

 BLOCK DIAGRAM:


Fig. 1. Test system schematic
EXPECTED SIMULATION RESULTS:


Fig. 2. ΔT order applied to the controller of the DFIG


Fig. 3. DFIG rotating speed, 150 MW


Fig. 4. DFIG electromagnetic torque, 150 MW


Fig. 5. HVDC link voltage , 150 MW


Fig. 6. HVDC link current, 150 MW


Fig. 7. Real and reactive power (rectifier side), 150 MW


Fig. 8. Real and reactive power (inverter side), 150 MW


Fig. 9. DFIG rotating speed, 180 MW


Fig. 10. DFIG electromagnetic torque, 180 MW


Fig. 11. HVDC link voltage , 180 MW


Fig. 12. HVDC link current, 180 MW


Fig. 13. Real and reactive power (rectifier side), 180 MW


Fig. 14. Real and reactive power (inverter side), 180 MW


Fig. 15. DFIG rotating speed, 200 MW, 12 m/s


Fig. 16. DFIG electromagnetic torque, 200 MW, 12 m/s



Fig. 17. HVDC link voltage , 200 MW, 12 m/s


Fig. 18. HVDC link current, 200 MW, 12 m/s

CONCLUSION:
Detailed time domain simulations were conducted in order to analyze the transients present on the inertial response of an offshore WPP delivering power through an HVDC-VSC link. Several results from transient behavior are presented, these results show that an offshore WPP connected to the grid via an HVDC-VSC link is able to deliver inertial response if it is requested.
These results are important as the WPP importance for the power system is growing and its performance during contingencies must be asured.
REFERENCES:
[1] A. Bodin, “HVDC Light—A Preferable Power Transmission System for Renewable Energies.” Proceedings of the 2011 Third International Youth Conference on Energetics; July 7–9, 2011, Leiria, Portugal
[2] M. de Prada Gil, O. Gomis-Bellmunt, A. Sumper, and J. Bergas-Jané, “Analysis of a Multi-Turbine Offshore Wind Farm Connected to a Single Large Power Converter Operated with Variable Frequency.” Energy (36: 5), May 2011; pp. 3272–3281
[3] Feltes, C., and Erlich, I. “Variable Frequency Operation of DFIG-Based Wind Farms Connected to the Grid Through VSC-HVDC Link.” IEEE Power Engineering Society General Meeting, June 24–28, 2007, Tampa, Florida.
[4] N. Miller, K. Clark, M. Cardinal, and R. Delmerico, "Grid-friendly wind plants controls: GE Wind CONTROL—Functionality and field tests," presented at European Wind Energy Conf., Brussels, Belgium, 2008.

[5] N. W. Miller, K. Clark, and M. Shao, “Impact of frequency responsive wind plant controls on grid performance,” presented at 9th International Workshop on Large-Scale Integration of Wind Power, Quebec, Canada, Oct. 18–19, 2010.