Neuro Fuzzy based controller for Power Quality Improvement
ABSTRACT:
Use of power electronic converters with nonlinear
loads leads to power quality problems by producing harmonic currents and
drawing reactive power. A shunt active power filter provides an elegant
solution for reactive power compensation as well as harmonic mitigation leading
to improvement in power quality. However, the shunt active power filter with PI
type of controller is suitable only for a given load. If the load is varied,
the proportional and integral gains are required to be fine tuned for each load
setting. The present study deals with hybrid artificial intelligence controller,
i.e. neuro fuzzy controller for shunt active power filter. The performance of
neuro fuzzy controller over PI controller is examined and tabulated. The
salvation of the problem is extensively verified with various loads and plotted
the worst case out of them for the sustainability of the neuro fuzzy
controller.
KEYWORDS:
1.
Active Power Filter
2.
Neuro Fuzzy Controller
3.
Back Propagation Algorithm
4.
Soft Computing
SOFTWARE: MATLAB/SIMULINK
BLOCK DIAGRAM:
Fig 1. Schematic Diagram of Shunt Active
Power Filter
Fig
2. (a) Waveform of Load Current, Compensating Current, Source
Current
and Source Voltage for Case V of Table1 (1kVA with α=60o) and
(b)
Waveform of Source Voltage and in phase Source Current of Fig. (a) Reproduced
CONCLUSION:
The
application of hybrid artificial intelligence technique on shunt active power
filter is proved to be an eminent solution for the mitigation of harmonics and
the compensation of reactive power. The hybrid artificial intelligence used
here is the neuro fuzzy controller. It takes the linguistic inputs as a fuzzy
logic controller and it adapts any situation in between the running of the
program as the neural network. The simulation results states that the active power
filter controller with neuro fuzzy controllers have been seen to eminently
minimize harmonics in the source current when the load demands non sinusoidal
current, irrespective of whether the load is fixed or variable when compared to
PI Controller. Simultaneously, the power factor at source also becomes the
unity, if the load demands reactive power. The neuro fuzzy controller is far
superior to the PI controller for all the loads. In the present work, a range
of values of the load is considered to robustly test the controllers. It has
been demonstrated that neuro fuzzy controller offers more acceptable results
over the PI controller. The neuro fuzzy controller, therefore, significantly
improves the performance of a shunt active power filter.
[1] Laszlo
Gyugyi, “Reactive Power Generation and Control by Thyristor Circuits”, IEEE
Transactions on Industry Applications, vol. IA-15, no. 5, September/October
1979.
[2] H.
Akagi, Y. Kanazawa, and A. Nabae, “Instantaneous reactive power compensators
comprising switching devices without energy storage components,” IEEE
Transaction Industrial Applications, vol. IA-20, pp. 625-630, May/June 1984.
[3] F.
Z. Peng, H. Akagi, and A. Nabae, “A study of active power filters using quad
series voltage source pwm converters for harmonic compensation,” IEEE
Transactions on Power Electronics, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 9–15, January 1990.
[4] Conor
A. Quinn, Ned Mohan, “Active Filtering of Harmonic Currents in Three-phase,
Four-Wire Systems with Three-phase and Single-phase Non-Linear Loads”,
IEEE-1992.
[5] L.
A. Morgan, J. W. Dixon, and R. R. Wallace, “A three-phase active power filter
operating with fixed switching frequency for reactive power and current
harmonic compensation,” IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, vol. 42,
no. 4, pp. 402–408, August 1995.