ABSTRACT:
This paper proposes a new control strategy for the
islanded operation of a multi-bus medium voltage (MV) microgrid. The microgrid
consists of several dispatchable electronically-coupled distributed generation (DG) units. Each DG
unit supplies a local load which can be unbalanced due to the inclusion of
singlephase loads. The proposed control
strategy of each DG comprises a proportional resonance (PR) controller with an
adjustable resonance frequency, a droop control strategy, and a
negative-sequence impedance controller (NSIC). The PR and droop controllers
are, respectively, used to regulate the load voltage and share the average power
components among the DG units. The NSIC is used to effectively compensate the
negative-sequence currents of the unbalanced loads and to improve the
performance of the overall microgrid system.Moreover, the NSIC minimizes the
negative-sequence currents in the MV lines and thus, improving the power
quality of the microgrid. The performance of the proposed control strategy is
verified by using digital time-domain simulation studies in the PSCAD/EMTDC
software environment.
KEYWORDS:
1.
Distributed
generation
2.
Medium voltage (MV)
3.
Microgrid
4.
Negative-sequence current
5.
Power sharing
6.
Unbalance load
7.
Voltage control
SOFTWARE: MATLAB/SIMULINK
CIRCUIT DIAGRAM:
Fig.
1. MV multi-bus microgrid consisting of two DG units.
EXPECTED SIMULATION RESULTS:
Fig.
2 Unbalanced load changes in feeder F1 (a) instantaneous real, and
(b)
reactive
power components.
Fig.
3. Amplitude of (a) positive- and (b) negative-sequence currents of the
feeders.
Fig.
4. Instantaneous voltages at DG terminals during unbalanced load
changes
in feeder F1, (a) DG1and (b) DG2 .
Fig.5.
Frequency of islanded microgrid during unbalanced load changes.
Fig.
6. (a) Negative-sequence output impedance of each DG, and (b) amplitude
of
negative-sequence current of DG units.
Fig.
7. Dynamic response of DG units to unbalanced load changes in feeder
F1:
(a) real power, and (b) reactive power components of DG units.
Fig.
8. Unbalanced load changes in feeders F3 and F2 (a, b)
instantaneous
real
and reactive power of feeders.
Fig.
9. Amplitude of (a) positive and (b) negative-sequence currents of the
feeders.
Fig.
10. (a) Negative-sequence output impedance, and (b) amplitude of negative-
sequence
current for each DG.
CONCLUSION:
This
paper presents a new control strategy for amulti-bus MV microgrid consisting of
the dispatchable electronically-coupled DG units and unbalanced loads. The
negative-sequence current of a local load is completely compensated by its
dedicated DG. However, the negative-sequence current of the nonlocal loads is shared
among the adjacent DGs. The proposed control strategy is composed of a PR
controller with non-fixed resonance frequency, a droop control, and a
negative-sequence impedance controller (NSIC). The PR and droop controllers
are, respectively, used to regulate the load voltage and to share the average power
among the DG units. The NSIC is used to improve the performance of the microgrid
system when the unbalanced loads are present. Moreover, the NSIC minimizes the
negative- sequence currents in the MV lines, and thus, improving the power
quality of the microgrid. The performance of the proposed control strategy is
investigated by using digital time-domain simulation studies in the PSCAD/EMTDC
software environment. The simulation results conclude that the proposed strategy:
•
robustly regulates voltage and frequency of the microgrid;
•
is able to share the average power among the DGs;
•
effectively compensates the negative-sequence currents of local loads; and
•
shares the negative-sequence current of the nonlocal loads such that the power
quality of the overall microgrid is not degraded.
REFERENCES:
[1]
N. Hatziargyriou, H. Asano, R. Iravani, and C. Marnay, “Microgrids,” IEEE
Power Energy Mag., vol. 5, pp. 78–94, Jul.–Aug. 2007.
[2]
A. G. Madureira and J. A. P. Lopes, “Coordinated voltage support in distribution
networks with distributed generation and microgrids,” IET Renew. Power Gener.,
vol. 3, pp. 439–454, Sep. 2009.
[3]
IEEE Recommended Practice for Monitoring Electric Power Quality, IEEE
Std. 1159, 2009.
[4]
IEEE Recommended Practice for Electric Power Distribution for Industrial Plants,
ANSI/IEEE Std. 141, 1993.
[5]
R. Lasseter, “Microgrids,” in Proc. IEEE Power Eng. Soc. Winter Meeting,
2002, pp. 305–308.