asokatechnologies@gmail.com 09347143789/09949240245

Search This Blog

Wednesday 19 December 2018

Balanced Voltage Sag Correction Using Dynamic Voltage Restorer Based Fuzzy Polar Controller



ABSTRACT:
Many controllers based fuzzy logic have been applied on electric power system. Frequently, time response of the fuzzy controllers is slowly, because the number of membership functions are too many. Many research are proposed to minimize the number of membership function, such as fuzzy polar controller method. By using this method, number of membership function can be minimized, so the time response of the controller become faster. This paper presents the Dynamic Voltage Restorer (DVR) based Fuzzy Polar Controller Method to compensate balanced voltage sag. Simulation results show that this proposed method can compensate balanced voltage sag better than PI controller.


 SOFTWARE: MATLAB/SIMULINK

BLOCK DIAGRAM:



 Fig. 1. Block diagram of DVR

EXPECTED SIMULATION RESULTS:



Fig. 2. 50% of voltage sags at bus A

Fig. 3. 50% sags correction using DVR based PI
Controller

Fig. 4. 50% sags correction using DVR based fuzzy
polar controller



CONCLUSION:

DVR based PI Controller can maintain 50% voltage sags at 110 % and 30% voltage sags at 98%. DVR based Fuzzy Polar Controller can maintain 50% voltage sags at 100 % and 30% voltage sags at 97%. According to the error average of all simulations, are shown that the performance of DVR based Fuzzy Polar Controller better than DVR based PI Controller. Further study for unbalance correction is being worked to prove the effectiveness of the proposed controller.

REFERENCES:
[1] Francisco Jurado ”Neural Network Control For Dynamic Voltage Restore” IEEE Transaction on Industrial Electronic. Vol 51,No.3, June 2004
[2] Margo Pujiantara, M Herry P, M Ashari, Imanda “Dynamic Voltage Restorer Using Y connected Boost Transformer Controlled by Backpropagation Neural Network” SMELDA, Malang 2005
[3] Fransisco Jurado, manuel Valverde :Voltage Correction By Dynamic Voltage Restorer Based on Fuzzy Logic Controller”: IEEE Transaction on Indutrial Electronics, may 2003.
[4] Thomas H. Ortmeyer and T. Hiyama, “Frequency Response Characteristics of The Fuzzy Polar Power System Stabilizer”, IEEE Transactions on Energy Conversion, Vol. 10, No.2, June 1995.
[5] S.S Min, K.C. Lee, J.W. Song and K.B. Cho, “A fuzzy current controller for field-oriented controlled induction machine by fuzzy rule”, in Proc. IEEE PESC, Toledo, Spain, 1992, pp. 265-270.