ABSTRACT:
In this paper,
a new combined cascaded multilevel inverter with reduced number of switches and
DC voltage sources which is formed by series connection of same units with developed
H-Bridge is proposed. For the purpose of generating all even and odd voltage
levels 5 algorithms to determine the magnitudes of DC voltage sources is
proposed. In order to investigate the advantages and disadvantages of the
proposed combined cascaded multilevel inverter the proposed algorithms are
compared to presented topologies from different points of view. The
experimental results of the proposed topology are stated to check and verifying
the performance of the proposed topology.
KEYWORDS:
1.
Multilevel inverter
2.
Cascaded multilevel inverter
3.
Combined topology
4.
Developed H-Bridge
SOFTWARE: MATLAB/SIMULINK
Fig. 1. Topology of proposed combined cascaded multilevel inverter.
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
(e)
(f)
(g)
(h)
(i)
Fig. 2. Experimental results; (a) output voltage; (b) output voltage and current; (c) generated voltage levels by right side; (d) generated voltage levels by left side; (e) generated voltage levels by L,1 u ; (f) voltage across R2,2 S ; (g)
voltage
across 1 T ; (h) voltage across 3 T ; (i) voltage across a T .
CONCLUSION:
In this paper, a new combined cascaded
multilevel inverter has been proposed. After that, five different algorithms
are proposed in order to determine the magnitudes of the DC voltage sources. By
comparing these algorithms, it was concluded that the algorithm which generates
a high number of voltage levels with less number of switches and DC voltage sources
is better than other algorithms. According to this comparison, it was found
that the fifth proposed algorithm is better among the proposed algorithms. In
order to prove the claim about reduction of the number of IGBTs and DC voltage sources
in the proposed topology, this topology was compared to presented topologies
from different aspects. In these comparisons, it was found that the proposed
topology generates 31 voltage levels with 14 IGBTs while presented topologies
in [4], [10] and [12] generate the same number of voltage levels with 32, 16
and 34 IGBTs, respectively. Also, it was found that this number of voltage
levels needs 4 DC voltage sources, whereas, the topologies which presented in [4]
and [12] generate 17 and 9 voltage levels with the same number of DC voltage sources. Afterwards,
correctness of performance of the proposed topology and relations have been verified
through experimentation of the proposed topology with 2 input units in each
side.
REFERENCES:
[1] C.I. Odeh, E.S. Obe, and O. Ojo,: “Topology
for cascaded multilevel inverter,” IET Power Electron., vol. 9, no. 5,
pp. 921-929, April 2016.
[2] E. Zamiri, N. Vosoughi, S.H.
Hosseini, R. Barzegarkhoo, and M. Sabahi, “A new cascaded switched-capacitor
multilevel inverter based on improved series–parallel conversion with less
number of components,” IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron., vol. 63, no. 6, pp. 3582-3594,
June 2016.
[3] N. Prabaharan and K. Palanisamy, “Analysis
of cascaded H-bridge multilevel inverter configuration with double level
circuit,” IET Power Electron., vol. 10, no. 9, pp. 1023-1033, July 2017.
[4] M.R. Banaei, M.R. Jannati Oskuee and
H. Khounjahan, “Reconfiguration of semi-cascaded multilevel inverter to improve
systems performance parameters,” IET Power Electron., vol. 7, no. 5, pp.
1106-1112, May 2014.
[5] E. Babaei, S. Laali, and Z. Bayat, “A
single-phase cascaded multilevel inverter based on a new basic unit with
reduced number of power switches,” IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron., vol. 62,
no. 2, pp. 922-929, Feb. 2015.