asokatechnologies@gmail.com 09347143789/09949240245

Search This Blog

Wednesday, 29 June 2016

A High Step-Up DC to DC Converter Under Alternating Phase Shift Control for Fuel Cell Power System


ABSTRACT
This paper investigates a novel pulse width modulation (PWM) scheme for two-phase interleaved boost converter with voltage multiplier for fuel cell power system by combining alternating phase shift (APS) control and traditional interleaving PWM control. The APS control is used to reduce the voltage stress on switches in light load while the traditional interleaving control is used to keep better performance in heavy load. The boundary condition for swapping between APS and traditional interleaving PWM control is derived. Based on the aforementioned analysis, a full power range control combining APS and traditional interleaving control is proposed. Loss breakdown analysis is also given to explore the efficiency of the converter. Finally, it is verified by experimental results.

KEYWORDS: Boost converter, Fuel cell, Interleaved, Loss breakdown, Voltage multiplier.

SOFTWARE: MATLAB/SIMULINK

BLOCK DIAGRAM:



Fig. 2. Main theoretical waveforms at boundary condition.

EXPERIMENTAL RESULTS:



 Fig.3 Experimental results at boundary condition with traditional interleaving control (L = 1158 μH, R = 2023 Ω, and D = 0.448). (a) CH1-S1 Driver Voltage, CH2 L1 Current, CH3-S1 Voltage Stress, CH4-Output Voltage, (b) CH1-S1 Driver Voltage, CH2 C1 Current, CH3-S1 Voltage Stress, CH4-OutputVoltage, (c) CH1-S1 DriverVoltage,CH2 D1 Current,CH3-S1 Voltage Stress, CH4-Output Voltage, (d) CH1-S1 Driver Voltage, CH2 DM1 Current, CH3-S1 Voltage Stress, CH4-Output Voltage.
Fig. 4. Traditional interleaving control at nominal load (L = 1158 μH and R = 478 Ω).

Fig. 5. Traditional interleaving control in Zone A (L = 1158 μH and R = 1658 Ω).


Fig. 6. Traditional interleaving control in Zone B (L = 1158 μH and R = 3460 Ω).

Fig. 7. APS control in Zone B (L = 1158 μH and R = 3460 Ω).

 CONCLUSION
The boundary condition is derived after stage analysis in this paper. The boundary condition classifies the operating states into two zones, i.e., Zone A and Zone B. The traditional interleaving control is used in Zone A while APS control is used in Zone B. And the swapping function is achieved by a logic unit. With the proposed control scheme, the converter can achieve low voltage stress on switches in all power range of the load, which is verified by experimental results.

REFERENCES
[1] N. Sammes, Fuel Cell Technology: Reaching Towards Commercialization. London, U.K.: Springer-Verlag, 2006.
[2] G. Fontes, C. Turpin, S. Astier, and T. A. Meynard, “Interactions between fuel cells and power converters: Influence of current harmonics on a fuel cell stack,” IEEE Trans. Power Electron., vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 670–678, Mar. 2007.
[3] P. Thounthong, B. Davat, S. Rael, and P. Sethakul, “Fuel starvation,” IEEE Ind. Appl. Mag., vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 52–59, Jul./Aug. 2009.
[4] S.Wang,Y.Kenarangui, and B. Fahimi, “Impact of boost converter switching frequency on optimal operation of fuel cell systems,” in Proc. IEEE Vehicle Power Propulsion Conf., 2006, pp. 1–5.

[5] S. K. Mazumder, R. K. Burra, and K. Acharya, “A ripple-mitigating and energy-efficient fuel cell power-conditioning system,” IEEE Trans. Power Electron., vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 1437–1452, Jul. 2007.