ABSTRACT:
The electric spring is an emerging technology proven
to be effective in i) stabilizing smart grid with substantial penetration of
intermittent renewable energy sources and ii) enabling load demand to follow
power generation. The subtle change from output voltage control to input
voltage control of a reactive power controller offers the electric spring new
features suitable for future smart grid applications. In this project, the
effects of such subtle control change are highlighted, and the use of the
electric springs in reducing energy storage requirements in power grid is
theoretically proven and practically demonstrated in an experimental setup of a
90 kVApower grid.Unlike traditional Statcom and StaticVar Compensation
technologies, the electric spring offers not only reactive power compensation
but also automatic power variation in non-critical loads. Such an advantageous
feature enables noncritical loads with embedded electric springs to be adaptive
to future power grid. Consequently, the load demand can follow power generation,
and the energy buffer and therefore energy storage requirements can be reduced.
KEYWORDS:
1.
Distributed
power systems
2.
Energy storage
3.
Smart grid
4.
Stability
SOFTWARE: MATLAB/SIMULINK
Fig.
1. Experimental setup based on the 90 kVA Smart Grid Hardware Simulation
System
at the Maurice Hancock Smart Energy Laboratory.
Fig.
3. Measured average powers of the wind power simulator (PG+PR),
battery storage (PS) and non-critical load(P1)
Fig.
5. Measured electric spring reactive power (QES), critical load
voltage (VR2) and power (P2).
CONCLUSION:
In
this paper, the differences between the output voltage control and the input
voltage control of a reactive power controller are highlighted. While energy
storage is an effective but expensive means to balance power supply and demand,
an analysis and practical confirmation are presented to show that electric springs
can reduce energy storage requirements in a power grid. Electric springs allow
the non-critical load power to vary with the renewable energy profile. By
reducing the instantaneous power imbalance of power supply and demand, electric
springs allow the non-critical load demand profile to follow the power
generation profile and reduce the energy storage requirements in power grid.
This important point has been theoretically proved and practically verified in
an experimental setup. Due to the advantageous features such as enabling the
load demand to follow the power generation, the reduction of energy storage requirements,
the reactive power compensation for voltage regulation, and the possibility of
both active and reactive power control [28], electric springs open a door to
distributed stability control for future smart grid with substantial
penetration of intermittent renewable energy sources.
REFERENCES:
[1]
D. Westermann and A. John, “Demand matching wind power generation with
wide-area measurement and demand-side management,” IEEE Trans. Energy
Convers., vol. 22, no. 1 , pp. 145–149, 2007.
[2]
P. Palensky and D. Dietrich, “Demand side management: Demand response, intelligent
energy systems, and smart loads,” IEEE Trans. Ind. Inform., vol. 7 , no.
3 , pp. 381–388, 2011.
[3]
P. Varaiya, F. Wu, and J. Bialek, “Smart operation of smart grid: Risklimiting dispatch,”
Proc. IEEE, vol. 99, no. 1 , pp. 40–57, 2011.
[4]
I. Koutsopoulos and L. Tassiulas, “Challenges in demand load control for the
smart grid,” IEEE Netw., vol. 25, no. 5 , pp. 16–21, 2011.
[5]
A. Mohsenian-Rad, V. W. S. Wong, J. Jatskevich, R. Schober, and A. Leon-Garcia,
“Autonomous demand-side management based on gametheoretic energy consumption
scheduling for the future smart grid,” IEEE Trans. Smart Grid, vol. 1 ,
no. 3 , pp. 320–331, 2011.