ABSTRACT:
This study examines the use of superconducting magnetic and battery
hybrid energy storage to compensate grid voltage fluctuations. The
superconducting magnetic energy storage system (SMES) has been emulated by a
high current inductor to investigate a system employing both SMES and battery
energy storage experimentally. The design of the laboratory prototype is
described in detail, which consists of a series-connected three phase voltage
source inverter used to regulate AC voltage, and two bidirectional DC/DC
converters used to control energy storage system charge and discharge. ‘DC bus
level signaling’ and ‘voltage droop control’ have been used to automatically
control power from the magnetic energy storage system during short-duration,
high power voltage sags, while the battery is used to provide power during
longer-term, low power under-voltages.
Energy storage
system hybridisation is shown to be advantageous by reducing battery peak power
demand compared with a battery-only system, and by improving long term voltage
support capability compared with a SMES-only system. Consequently, the
SMES/battery hybrid DVR can support both short term high-power voltage sags and
long term undervoltages with significantly reduced superconducting material
cost compared with a SMES-based system.
KEYWORDS:
1. Dynamic Voltage Restorer (DVR)
2. Energy
Storage Integration
3. Sag
4. Superconducting
Magnetic Energy Storage
5. Battery
SOFTWARE: MATLAB/SIMULINK
BLOCK DIAGRAM:
Figure 1. Hybrid energy storage DVR system
configuration.
EXPECTED SIMULATION RESULTS:
Figure 2. Simulated PLL Algorithm results: (a)
Simulated voltage sag with phase jump (b) Phase jump angle (c) Blue trace:
supply phase angle. Red trace: PLL output: ‘Pre-sag compensation’ with
controller gains: kp = 0.5, ki = 5, (d)
Blue trace: supply phase angle. Red trace: PLL output: ‘In phase compensation’ with
controller gains kp = 200, ki = 50.
Figure 3. Hybrid System Experimental results: 0.1s
Three phase sag to 35% of nominal voltage. (a) Supply voltages (b) Load
voltages (c) DC Link Voltage (d) Battery Current (e) SMES-inductor current.
Figure
4. Battery System Experimental results: 0.1s Three phase sag to 35% of nominal
voltage. (a) Supply voltages (b) Load voltages (c) DC Link Voltage (d) Battery
Current.
Figure 5. Hybrid System Experimental results:
Long-term three phase under voltage (a) RMS supply phase-voltage. (b) RMS load
phase-voltage (c) DC Bus Voltage (d) Battery Current (e) SMES-inductor current.
.
CONCLUSION:
The
performance a novel hybrid DVR system topology has been assessed experimentally
and shown to effectively provide voltage compensation for short-term sags and
long-term under-voltages. A prototype system has been developed which
demonstrates an effective method of interfacing SMES and battery energy storage
systems to support a three phase load. The system has been shown to
autonomously prioritise the use of the short-term energy storage system to
support the load during deep, short-term voltage sags and a battery for lower
depth, long-term under-voltages. This can have benefits in terms of improved
voltage support capability and reduced costs compared with a SMES-based system.
Additional benefits include reduced battery power rating requirement and an
expected improvement in battery life compared with a battery-only system due to
reduced battery power cycling and peak discharge power.
REFERENCES:
[1]
P.K. Ray, S.R. Mohanty, N. Kishor, and J.P.S. Catalao, "Optimal Feature
and Decision Tree-Based Classification of Power Quality Disturbances in
Distributed Generation Systems," Sustainable Energy, IEEE Trans., vol.
5, Sept. 2014, pp. 200-208.
[2]
D. Novosel, G. Bartok, G. Henneberg, P. Mysore, D. Tziouvaras, and S. Ward,
"IEEE PSRC Report on Performance of Relaying During Wide-Area Stressed
Conditions," Power Delivery, IEEE Trans., vol. 25, Jan. 2010, pp.
3-16.
[3]
"IEEE Recommended Practice for Monitoring Electric Power Quality," in
IEEE Std 1159-1995, ed. New York, NY: IEEE Standards Board, 1995, p. i.
[4]
S. Jothibasu and M.K. Mishra, "A Control Scheme for Storageless DVR Based
on Characterization of Voltage Sags," Power Delivery, IEEE Trans., vol.
29, July 2014, pp. 2261-2269.
[5]
B. Otomega and T. Van Cutsem, "Undervoltage Load Shedding Using
Distributed Controllers," Power Systems, IEEE Trans., vol. 22, Nov.
2007, pp. 1898-1907.