ABSTRACT:
1. Industrial
Microgrid
2. Vehicle
to Grid
3. Electric
Vehicle
4. Grid
to Vehicle
5. Primary
Frequency Control
6. State
of Charge
SOFTWARE:
MATLAB/SIMULINK
CONCLUSION:
This
paper studies the impact of EVs’ charging on an industrial microgrid. The
control scheme is implemented through grid regulation and charger controllers
which provide bidirectional power flow. This dual power flow not only provides
charging power to EVs but also ensures frequency regulation through active and
reactive power support. The charging station consists of a central AC/DC VSC
station that injects power into an industrial microgrid and minimizes frequency
deviations. Different contingencies have been simulated and their impact on
primary frequency is observed. Simulation results prove that the proposed
bidirectional charging strategy contributes effectively towards frequency
regulation. The frequency is well regulated within the acceptable margin when
V2G mode is enabled for EVs’ charging/discharging as compared to when V2G mode
was disabled. Frequency regulation improves even further by increasing the
number of EVs in the fleet as more vehicles contribute to grid regulation mode.
Hence, simulation results prove the robustness of the proposed controllers.
REFERENCES:
[1] P. Zhou and M. Wang, "Carbon dioxide emissions allocation: A review," Ecological Economics, vol. 125, pp. 47-59, 2016.
[2] N. Zhang, K. Yu and Z. Chen, "How does urbanization affect carbon dioxide emissions? A cross-country panel data analysis," Energy Policy, vol. 107, pp. 678-687, 2017.
[3] M. A. Abdelbaky, X. Liu and D. Jiang, "Design and implementation of partial offline fuzzy model-predictive pitch controller for large-scale wind-turbines," Renewable Energy, vol. 145, pp. 981-996, 2020/01/01/ 2020.
[4] M. A. Abdelbaky, X. Liu and X. Kong, "Wind Turbines Pitch Controller using Constrained Fuzzy-Receding Horizon Control," in 2019 Chinese Control And Decision Conference (CCDC), 2019, pp. 236-241.
[5]
P. Weldon, P. Morrissey and M. O’Mahony, "Long-term cost of ownership
comparative analysis between electric vehicles and internal combustion engine
vehicles," Sustainable Cities and Society, vol. 39, pp. 578-591,
2018.