asokatechnologies@gmail.com 09347143789/09949240245

Search This Blog

Saturday 10 July 2021

Coordination of SMES, SFCL and Distributed Generation Units for Micro-Grid Stability Enhancement via Wireless Communications

ABSTRACT:

To enhance the stability of a micro-grid under fault conditions, this paper proposes the coordination control of a superconducting magnetic energy storage (SMES), an active superconducting fault current limiter (SFCL), and distributed generation units via wireless network communications. This coordination control can smoothly separate the micro-grid from the main network in case of severe or permanent faults, and assist the micro-grid to achieve the fault ride-through (FRT) operation if the fault is minor or temporary. Details on the modeling, control strategy, and network architecture are presented. Moreover, the simulation analysis of a 10 kV class micro-grid including the SMES, SFCL, and photovoltaic generation units is implemented in MATLAB. Concerning the performance evaluation of the coordination control, not only severe and minor faults, but also different communication delays are taken into account. The results confirm the effectiveness of the proposed coordination control.

KEYWORDS:

1.      Coordination control

2.      Distributed generation

3.      Micro-grid

4.      Superconducting fault current limiter (SFCL)

5.      Superconducting magnetic energy storage (SMES)

6.      Wireless communications

SOFTWARE: MATLAB/SIMULINK

CONCLUSION:

In order to improve the stability of a micro-grid under short-circuit faults, this paper proposes and investigates the coordination of a SMES unit, an active SFCL, and multiple distributed generation units via the wireless communications. The severe and minor faults are considered, and the impacts of the wireless communication delay on the coordination performance are also studied. The results well demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed coordination control, and it can maintain the power balance, accelerate the load recovery, suppress the PCC fault current, and mitigate the voltage-frequency fluctuation. Thus, the micro-grid’s transient performance is able to be enhanced considerably, and further the technical advantages of the SMES, active SFCL, distributed generation units and wireless communications can be fully utilized.

In the near future, the improvement of the coordination control will be carried out from multiple aspects, such as the parameter optimizations of the SMES and the SFCL, the robustness advancement of the wireless network, the suitableness enhancement of the coordination control for a large micro-grid/test system including several DG resources and control structures. In addition, the current coordination control does not consider the effects of the load dynamics on the transient performance of the micro-grid, and it means that just two static power loads are used. On the one hand, with regard to the necessity of introducing the load dynamics, it may closely depend on whether the current coordination control of the SMES, active SFCL and distributed generation units is enough to stabilize the micro-grid under the fault conditions. On the other hand, if more electrical devices take part in the coordination control, an intelligent coordination method based on multi-agent system technology can be properly applied. Related research results will be reported in later articles.

 REFERENCES:

 [1] Jae-young Yoon, Seung-ryul Lee, and In-tae Hwang, “A Quantitative Analysis on Future World Marketability of HTS Power Industry,” IEEE Trans. Smart Grid, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 433–436, Feb. 2013.

[2] Jianwei Li, Qingqing Yang, Francis. Robinson, Fei Liang, Min Zhang, and Weijia Yuan, “Design and test of a new droop control algorithm for a SMES/battery hybrid energy storage system,” Energy, vol. 118, pp. 1110–1122, Jan. 2017.

[3] Meng Song, et al., “100 kJ/50 kW HTS SMES for Micro-Grid,” IEEE Trans. Appl. Superconduct., vol. 25, no. 3, June 2015, Art. ID. 5700506.

[4] Thai-Thanh Nguyen, et al., “Applying Model Predictive Control to SMES System in Microgrids for Eddy Current Losses Reduction,” IEEE Trans. Appl. Superconduct., vol. 26, no. 4, June 2016, Art. ID. 5400405.

[5] Lei Chen, et al., “Comparison of Superconducting Fault Current Limiter and Dynamic Voltage Restorer for LVRT Improvement of High Penetration Micro-Grid,” IEEE Trans. Appl. Superconduct., vol. 27, no. 4, June 2017, Art. ID. 3800607.